Upcoming Changes to Internal-Use Software Accounting: What Operations and Finance Needs to Know

Learn about the FASB’s proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) for internal-use software costs. Understand key changes, impacts on cost tracking and budgeting, and how ClickTime can simplify compliance and labor cost reporting.

Published – November 23, 2024
Rachel Carr

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that will modernize the way companies account for costs related to internal-use software. This update, set to take effect in the near future, aims to simplify and standardize the process while improving transparency for financial reporting.

If your company capitalizes labor costs and other expenses for internal-use software projects, this ASU could significantly impact your processes. Here's a quick breakdown of what's changing and how it may affect you.

Key Changes to Internal-Use Software Accounting

  1. "Probable-to-Complete" Threshold: Under the new guidance, costs can only be capitalized once management has authorized and committed to funding a project, and it's probable the project will be completed. This replaces the current reliance on specific project stages, such as "application development," providing more flexibility but requiring clearer documentation.
  2. Transparency in Cash Flow Statements: Capitalized software costs, including labor, will be classified as investing activities in cash flow statements. This ensures a clear distinction between operational expenses and investments in software development.
  3. Handling Development Uncertainty: For projects involving innovative or untested technologies, capitalization will be deferred until uncertainties are resolved. This means clearer criteria for labor costs associated with exploratory or evolving requirements.

 

Implications

It's important to consult your company's operations and finance leadership to understand particular implications. However, from our point of view, we'd suggest reviewing the following two areas within your organization to prepare for these changes.

Cost Tracking

Companies will likely need robust systems to segregate labor and other expenses tied to capitalized software projects, ensuring compliance with the new standards.

Budgeting

Finance teams should prepare for stricter thresholds around project approval and funding, as only costs linked to probable completion can be capitalize

How ClickTime Can Help

At ClickTime, we are not accountants, nor can we make recommendations for your organization. However, we do specialize in helping companies streamline the tracking and categorization of time and expenses, including labor costs for CapEx projects.

  • Precisely track labor costs: Easily collect the right time data to monitor the overall costs of projects.
  • Automate cost reporting: Ensure labor costs are properly categorized for cash flow statements.
  • Simplify compliance: Generate audit-ready reports to document project approval and funding timelines.

The proposed ASU represents a step forward in aligning accounting standards with modern software development methods. For businesses, it's an opportunity to improve cost tracking and financial transparency. With the right tools in place, compliance doesn't have to be complicated.

Want to learn more about how ClickTime can support your CapEx tracking needs? Contact us today to schedule a demo.

This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional accounting or financial advice. Companies should consult with their accountants or other qualified financial advisors to fully understand the impact of the proposed ASU on their specific operations.

Rachel Carr
Rachel Carr

More insights from our team

Explore all insights

Strategic Forecasting Part 3: Modeling Staffing and Productivity Curves for Accurate Financial Planning

In part one of this series of articles, I discussed "Strategic Financial Forecasting: How Time Tracking Data Transforms Multi-Year Financial Models." In part two, I focused on "Building a Calendar System that Anchors Multi-Year Models." In this article, I will explain how to create staffing and resource allocation models using actual productivity curves for more accurate and actionable forecasts.

Strategic Forecasting Part 2: Building a Calendar System That Anchors Multi-Year Models

Most finance teams use rough approximations like "22 working days per month," creating systematic errors that compound into millions of dollars of variance in multi-year forecasts. Precise calendar systems that account for holidays, time off, and productivity patterns dramatically improve forecast accuracy and stakeholder confidence.

Jira for Sprints, not Audits: Why Jira for Audits Won't Suffice

If your time tracking tool only supports engineering workflows, your audit trail is already broken.

https://www.clicktime.com/blog/upcoming-changes-to-internal-use-software-accounting